A Death in Texas vs. A Hanging
Steve Earle wrote A Death in Texas, and George Orwell wrote A Hanging. Both authors set a indignant tone in their short stories, and also in comparison they are very much against the death penalty. One thing that differs between the two stories is how the prisoners lived, and how they were treated.
To begin with , Steve Earle and George Orwell, both wrote their novel with an indignant tone. When Steve Earle writes,” Our criminal justice system isn’t known for rehabilitation”, this makes Earle sound angry about the injustice in our Prisons. In George Orwell’s A Hanging, the tone is also indignant. At the beginning the tone is callous but as he proceeds with carrying out his orders the tone becomes indignant, he realizes that what was about to happen is wrong. ,When Orwell writes,” When I saw the prisoner step aside to avoid the puddle I saw the mystery, the unspeakable wrongness, of cutting a life short when it is in full tide.”
Similarly, George Orwell and Steve Earle are clearly against the death penalty. Both authors subtly make their case against the death penalty without telling the reader what to think. Earle writes,” Given as many people as we lock up, we better learn to rehabilitate someone.” Earle is clearly against the death penalty and believes that we should be helping these lost souls and give them another chance. When George Orwell writes, he writes as though he was just doing his job, but then he became aware of the wrongness of killing a man. A man that was just like himself. “This man was not dying; he was alive just as we are alive.” Although Orwell was not as close to the prisoner in the story like Earle, he still felt that it was wrong. Orwell wrote with a more professional perspective.
On the other hand, Orwell and Earle wrote differently about how the prisoners were treated and the living conditions of their prison. Orwell paints a picture of a gloomy, dirty and a bleak prison. He also talks...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document